Banner Art

Archives Sunset Reviews Conducted by Standing Committees 2007



Air Quality Science Advisory Board By law, a number of entities, functions, and boards within Colorado government are scheduled to terminate each July.  Under the Colorado sunset review process, the entities and functions scheduled for termination on July 1, 2008, will be reviewed by House committees of reference in the coming months. This document provides: 
  • a description of the sunset review process;
  • a list of entities, functions, and boards scheduled for review; 
  • the criteria considered in the extension of an entity or function of Colorado government; and
  • the options available to a committee of reference in making recommendations to the General Assembly after conducting sunset hearings. 


Sunset Process Allows General Assembly to Review Regulatory Functions


Generally, a sunset law is a law that automatically terminates a state regulatory agency, board, or function of government on a certain date. A state legislature must act to continue the entity or function by passing a bill. Sunset laws cause legislatures to periodically review the need for state regulation or for advisory committees and to update the law creating the entity or function. These reviews seek to balance the need for regulation to protect the public interest with the need to ensure that state agencies, industry and the professions, and functions of government are not over-regulated. 

In Colorado, the task of conducting sunset reviews is assigned to committees of reference of the General Assembly. House committees conduct sunset reviews for the entities and functions scheduled to terminate in 2008. (Senate committees conduct sunset reviews for entities with sunset dates in odd-numbered years; House committees conduct sunset reviews for entities with sunset dates in even-numbered years.)  


Executive Branch Conducts Initial Review of Entities and Functions


A department within the executive branch of state government conducts a study of the entity or government function prior to the legislative sunset hearings. The Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) produces a "sunset report" by October 15 for each entity and function scheduled to sunset on the following July 1. This sunset report describes the history of the entity, examines the laws which created the entity, and makes recommendations regarding changes to the law and continuation of the entity.


General Assembly Conducts Public Reviews of the Regulatory Functions


In conducting a sunset review, a legislative committee reviews recommendations from the Department of Regulatory Agencies concerning continuation of the entity or government function in question. The review is conducted at a public hearing that occurs after the report is published or at the beginning of the legislative session. The committee also takes testimony from interested members of the public and program administrators. 


Evaluation and Review of Entities and Functions Is Based on Statutory Criteria


Each entity and function scheduled for termination has the burden of demonstrating that a public need exists for its continued existence and that its regulation is the least restrictive regulation consistent with the public interest. The determination as to whether a public need exists for the entity or function of government, and for the degree of regulation it practices, is based on the following factors, among others:

Automobile Theft Prevention Board
Bingo and Games of Chance/Bingo-Raffle Advisory Board
Collection Agencies, Regulation of
Community Contracted Health Care Providers Use by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
CoverColorado Assessments Imposed by the Division of Insurance
Domestic Violence Offender Management Board
Dynamic Modeling Advisory Committee
Health Care Credentials Application Review Committee
In-Home Support Services
Insurance Producers, Regulation of
Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
Passenger Tramway Safety Board
Public Utilities Commission
Real Estate Division and Real Estate Commission Including Function of Making Available Errors and Omissions Insurance to Licensees, and Use of Secretary of State as Agent for Service of Process


  1. Whether regulation by the agency is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; whether the conditions that led to the initial regulation have changed; and whether other conditions have arisen that would warrant more, less, or the same degree of regulation;
  2. If regulation is necessary, whether the existing statutes and regulations establish the least restrictive form of regulation consistent with the public interest, considering other available regulatory mechanisms, and whether agency rules enhance the public interest and are within the scope of legislative intent;
  3. Whether the agency operates in the public interest and whether its operation is impeded or enhanced by existing statutes, rules, procedures, and practices and any other circumstances, including budgetary, resource, and personnel matters;
  4. Whether an analysis of agency operations indicates that the agency performs its statutory duties efficiently and effectively;
  5. Whether the composition of the agency's board or commission adequately represents the public interest and whether the agency encourages public participation in its decisions rather than participation only by the people it regulates;
  6. The economic impact of regulation and, if national economic information is not available, whether the agency stimulates or restricts competition;
  7. Whether complaint, investigation, and disciplinary procedures adequately protect the public and whether final dispositions of complaints are in the public interest or self-serving to the profession;
  8. Whether the scope of practice of the regulated occupation contributes to the optimum utilization of personnel and whether entry requirements encourage affirmative action; and
  9. Whether administrative and statutory changes are necessary to improve agency operations to enhance the public interest.

Committee of Reference Has Several Options for Recommendations

A committee of reference may recommend that an entity or function of government be continued or terminated. If the assigned committee believes that an entity or function should be continued, it recommends a bill to the full General Assembly to accomplish this. In addition to continuing the existence of the entity, the bill may also make adjustments to the area of the law establishing the entity. With the exception of advisory committees, entities and functions of government may be continued for any time period up to 15 years. There is no similar limitation on the continuation of advisory committees. Generally, after conducting a sunset review of an existing advisory committee and recreating the committee, the General Assembly has not placed time limits on the life of the committee.

A standing committee recommends termination of an entity or function simply by not proposing legislation for its continuation.  In the event that the General Assembly allows an entity or function of state government to terminate, the entity or function continues to exist for the next succeeding year for the purpose of "winding up affairs."

Sunset Bills Follow Procedures for Other Bills During Legislative Session

Any bills recommended at sunset hearings by committees of reference will be introduced in the House during the 2008 session and proceed through the normal legislative process. The Speaker of the House is required to assign the bills to the same committee that conducted the sunset hearing. The House committees of reference holds public hearings on the bills and may kill the bills or pass them on to the full House for second and third reading.

If the bill survives the House, the process is repeated in the Senate. After both the House of Representatives and the Senate adopt the bill, the bill is then sent to the Governor for action. The Governor may sign the bill into law, veto the bill, or permit the bill to become law without a signature.

Accessing Sunset Reports

Sunset reports are available after October 15, 2007.  They can be obtained by clicking on the name of the board to the left or by contacting Legislative Council Staff.

Sunrise Process


Massage Therapists


A "sunrise" process is provided in Colorado law for individuals who seek new regulation of occupations or professions.  The process includes the preparation of a "sunrise report" by the Department of Regulatory Agencies that evaluates the need for the proposed regulation.  To initiate the sunrise process, a proponent of new regulation must submit a sunrise application to the department.  The department provides a completed sunrise report to the proponents and to the General Assembly within120 days of the submission of the application.  Please note that the department may decline to conduct an analysis in specific circumstances.

Proponents of sunrise legislation have the obligation of finding sponsors for their sunrise bills.  Once introduced, a sunrise bill is treated the same as any other bill.  The department's sunrise report may be used as background information for the bill hearing.

Colorado law includes a list of criteria that the Department of Regulatory Agencies must consider in making a recommendation on whether regulation of an occupation or profession is needed.  This determination is based upon the following considerations:

  1. Whether the unregulated practice of the occupation or profession clearly harms or endangers the health, safety, or welfare of the public, and whether the potential for the harm is easily recognizable and not remote or dependent upon tenuous argument;

  2. Whether the public needs, and can reasonably be expected to benefit from, an assurance of initial and continuing professional or occupational competence; and 

  3. Whether the public can be adequately protected by other means in a more cost-effective manner.



  See the Department of Regulatory Agencies Web site for more information on Sunrise/Sunset criteria and reports

Bookmark and Share